Consumers: 3508 results found Export XML

BIPT imposes a fine on Orange because the latter has failed to indicate the Internet volume used on its monthly fixed broadband Internet invoices.

Judgement of the Brussels Court of Appeal of 25 October 2017 regarding the actions against the decisions of the CRC of 11 December 2013 and of 19 February 2016 regarding the wholesale tariffs for the access services to the cable networks on the territory of the bilingual Brussels Capital Region

Judgement of the Brussels Court of Appeal of 25 October 2017 regarding the actions against the decisions of the CRC of 11 December 2013 and of 19 February 2016 regarding the wholesale tariffs for the access services to the cable networks on the territory of the French-speaking Region

Judgement of the Brussels Court of Appeal of 25 October 2017 regarding the actions against the decisions of the CRC of 11 December 2013 and of 19 February 2016 regarding the wholesale tariffs for the access services to the cable networks on the territory of the German-speaking Region

Judgement of the Brussels Court of Appeal of 25 October 2017 regarding the actions against the decisions of the CRC of 11 December 2013 and of 19 February 2016 regarding the wholesale tariffs for the access services to the cable networks on the territory of the Dutch-speaking Region

Brussels, 27 October 2017 – On 25 October 2017, the Brussels Court of Appeal annulled the decisions of the Conference of regulators in the electronic communications sector (CRC) of 2013 regarding the wholesale tariffs for access services to cable networks and its decisions of 2016 regarding the revision of these tariffs. In order to avoid any legal insecurity and not to disturb the good functioning of the market, the annulment of said decisions will only take effect on 30 April 2018. Until then, the CRC has planned a market analysis with new tariff provisions.

The legislator has assigned a number of responsibilities to certain intelligence services and judicial authorities, and has imposed various obligations on operators and service providers.

By way of this opinion BIPT wants to point out a number of positive elements on the one hand, but also formulate a number of comments on the bill regarding postal services (reference DOC 54 2694/001) on the other hand.

BIPT warns again against illegal “DECT 6.0” cordless telephones; they create interferences on mobile operators’ networks.