Consumers: 140 results found Export XML

This decision establishes the tariffs applicable by Belgacom for the interconnection services listed below for the 2008-2010 period: call origination in the network of Belgacom (“collecting”) call termination in the network of Belgacom (“terminating”) transit access to an access point (ATAP) activation of carrier preselection (CPS) access to the value-added services of other operators (VAS)

This decision designates Belgacom (now: Proximus) as having significant market power and imposes a series of obligations to fulfil on the operator. Belgacom lodged an appeal against that decision.

This decision concerns the revision proposition of annex K of the BROBA and BRUO reference offers of Belgacom. This annex deals with the migrations between BRUO and BROBA.

This decision concerns the monthly fees applicable to the ADSL, ADSL2+ and SDSL technologies within the framework of the BROBA reference offer.

This decision concerns the tariff aspects of Belgacom’s BROTSoLL reference offer.

This decision concerns the tariffs of some fees (“one-time fees”) of the BROBA offer following the introduction of a “Full VP (Virtual Path)” process by Belgacom.

Based on the regulatory framework defined by the market analysis of 11 August 2006, BIPT imposed a fine on Belgacom on 25 July 2008 for not having reflected the tariff cuts for mobile termination on the end-user. Belgacom lodged an appeal against that decision.

This decision aims at ensuring compliance of the “NTP process” addendum with the regulatory obligations of Belgacom. This addendum concerns the BRUO and BROBA installations, for which a difference is now made between the installations with or without the visit of a technician to the customer’s premises (“with customer visit” or “without customer visit”).

This decision concerns the proposition of Belgacom on the “rental fees” for ADSL2+ within the framework of the 2008 BROBA reference offer.

This decision concerns the proposition of Belgacom on the “one-time fees” for ADSL2+ within the framework of the BROBA reference offer. Mobistar and KPN Belgium lodged an appeal against this decision at the same time as another decision of BIPT on the “rental fees” of ADSL2+.