Operators: 2845 results found Export XML

Consultation of 14 December 2022 at the request of the Minister of Telecommunications on Article 2 of the draft Royal Decree regarding the data to be retained by the operators of electronic communications for the authorities, pursuant to articles 126 to 126/3 of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications, and the statistics on the communication of these data to the authorities

As of 2019, postal operators providing cross-border parcel delivery services within Europe have to comply with the obligations resulting from the new EU Regulation 2018/644 of 18 April 2018 on cross-border parcel delivery services. In accordance with Article 6 of this Regulation, BIPT shall assess the bpost rates considered in order to identify those tariffs that it considers to be unreasonably high.

Consultation on the draft decision of the BIPT Council on radio interfaces related to intelligent transport systems (ITS)

Due to the current high inflation rates, consumers are paying more attention to their budgets. Moreover, some operators also reflect the rising inflation in their prices. Therefore, regularly comparing tariffs in a far from uniform telecommunications market is more useful than ever to save money, regardless of the household budget. Several telecommunications offers have recently adjusted the amount of data included. Carrying out a tariff comparison helps consumers see which services best suit their real needs. The latest national price comparison study of the BIPT shows that this approach pays off.

Carrying out a tariff comparison helps consumers see which services best suit their real needs.

Following the decision on the analysis of the broadband and television broadcasting markets of 29 June 2018, BIPT reviewed SLA’s and compensation calculation of the BRUO, Bitstream xDSL and Bitstream GPON reference offers of Proximus.

By this appeal, Telenet intends to contest the objections raised by the BIPT in this decision and asks for a reclassification of the infringement and a revision of the amount of the fine imposed.

The decisions listed in this section have been adopted as complements to market analyses in order to specify the obligations of Proximus regarding the unbundling of the local loop. Most of these decisions regard the implementation of the reference offer developed within this framework by Proximus and historically known under the name “BRUO”.

The decisions listed in this section have been adopted as complements to market analyses in order to specify the obligations of Proximus regarding the bitstream access. Most of these decisions regard the implementation of reference offers developed within this framework by Proximus and historically known under the names “BROBA” (ADSL) and “WBA” (VDSL2).

Revision of reference offers of Proximus